View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0005282 | Kali Linux | Kali Package Bug | public | 2019-02-28 15:11 | 2019-03-01 12:37 |
| Reporter | peerj | Assigned To | sbrun | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Product Version | 2019.1 | ||||
| Summary | 0005282: Driver installation for AWUS1900 on RPi 3+ fails consistently. | ||||
| Description | Installing the driver for USB wifi network card fails. See below for installation protocol and some other information. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | apt-get install realtek-rtl88xxau-dkms | ||||
| Additional Information | dmesg[108322.588622] usb 1-1.2: new high-speed USB device number 8 using dwc_otg lsusbBus 001 Device 008: ID 0bda:8813 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL8814AU 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wireless Adapter #Treiberinstallation: apt-get install realtek-rtl88xxau-dkmsReading package lists... Done cat /var/lib/dkms/realtek-rtl88xxau/5.2.20.2~20181106/build/make.logDKMS make.log for realtek-rtl88xxau-5.2.20.2~20181106 for kernel 4.14.71-v8 (aarch64) ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid. WARNING: Symbol version dump ./Module.symvers Building modules, stage 2. uname -aLinux kali 4.14.71-v8 0000001 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 31 21:41:06 UTC 2018 aarch64 GNU/Linux | ||||
|
Thank you for your interest in Kali. |
|
|
Reported to upstream, see: |
|
|
I closed the bug on upstream where the conclusion is:
I'm not sure how my installation started to switch to 4.19 (my guess it's the rolling upgrades starting from the 2018.4 image) although I still had the 4.14 kernel, a desync which seemed to hinder the driver compilations which he declared now as unsupported for Kali-RP. |
|
|
Also, the explanations from upstream made me remember that when I chose the image to install, I didn't know which one to chose from https://www.offensive-security.com/kali-linux-arm-images/, my platform being a RPi3+: Kali Linux RPi So I went with the 64 bit following some incomplete heuristic based on lack of knowledge in the details of the differences between these versions, excluding only RPi0w (which it is not) and "P4wnP1 Aloa" (which googling showed it to be a special purpose use of the Pi, so it looks like maybe it should rather be a meta package and not a separate image), and considereing that "" must mean some kind of old RPi 1 or so, and "64 bit" being more advanced and thus better, although with the explanations it seems that it's rather less advanced since it's newer and less tested. In other words, I become somewhat unwittingly a tester for the newer 64 bit platform instead of getting a better proven image to test the things I wanted to test. That's fine with me since it's a useful learning experience as well, but maybe the download page could benefit with some more details to help choose the right image: |
|
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-28 15:11 | peerj | New Issue | |
| 2019-02-28 15:52 | sbrun | Note Added: 0010377 | |
| 2019-02-28 16:18 | peerj | Note Added: 0010378 | |
| 2019-03-01 10:56 | peerj | Note Added: 0010380 | |
| 2019-03-01 11:21 | peerj | Note Added: 0010381 | |
| 2019-03-01 12:37 | sbrun | Assigned To | => sbrun |
| 2019-03-01 12:37 | sbrun | Status | new => closed |
| 2019-03-01 12:37 | sbrun | Resolution | open => no change required |